The US Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) Bureau of Industry and Security has initiated an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to determine the effects on US national security from imports of Neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets, a product used in a wide range of critical defense and civilian applications. This is the first Section 232 investigation initiated under the Biden Administration, and it follows from a recommendation contained in White House supply chain reviews. This White House review found that only China has active capacity across all supply chain tiers of the NdFeB industry—meaning that this imbalance may be a focus of the investigation and any resulting remedy.

The investigation will assess whether NdFeB permanent magnets are being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security. If Commerce makes an affirmative finding, US President Joe Biden is authorized to take action he deems necessary “to adjust the imports” of the NdFeB permanent magnets and its “derivatives” so that such imports will not threaten to impair the national security. Such action could include the imposition of tariffs or other measures designed to ensure the national security of the United States is not reliant on foreign supply.

Companies that are interested in this proceeding have an opportunity to provide comments to Commerce by November 12, 2021.

NdFeB permanent magnets have permanent magnetic fields, and they contain rare earths which increase the strength of the magnet. These magnets are used for a broad range of products, including the following:

Military applications, such as fighter aircraft and missile guidance systems;

Climate-related applications, such as electric vehicles and wind turbines; and

Consumer electronics, such as computer hard drives, audio equipment and MRI devices.

Given that these magnets are often embedded in technology, one of the challenges in this investigation is that it may be difficult to identify the source of such magnets.

This investigation is part of heightened US government attention to the importance of critical minerals and rare earth elements to the US supply chain.

Commerce has invited interested parties to submit comments—including any data, analyses or information pertinent to its investigation—by November 12, 2021.

Although interested parties are free to submit comments on any topic relevant to the investigation, Commerce has expressed particular interest in comments addressing the following topics:

Quantity of or other circumstances related to the importation of NdFeB permanent magnets;

Domestic production and productive capacity needed for NdFeB permanent magnets to meet projected national defense requirements;

Existing and anticipated availability of human resources, products, raw materials, production equipment and facilities to produce NdFeB permanent magnets;

Growth requirements of the NdFeB permanent magnets industry to meet national defense requirements and/or requirements for supplies and services necessary to assure such growth, including investment, exploration and development;

The impact of foreign competition on the economic welfare of the domestic NdFeB permanent magnets industry;

The displacement of any domestic NdFeB permanent magnets production causing substantial unemployment, decrease in the revenues of government, loss of investment or specialized skills and productive capacity, or other serious effects;

Relevant factors that are causing or will cause a weakening of the country’s economy; and

Any other relevant factors, including the use and importance of NdFeB permanent magnets in the following “critical infrastructure sectors”: (1) chemical; (2) commercial facilities; (3) communications; (4) critical manufacturing sector; (5) dams; (6) defense industrial base; (7) emergency services; (8) energy; (9) financial services; (10) food and agriculture; (11) government facilities; (12) healthcare and public health; (13) information technology; (14) nuclear reactors, materials and waste; (15) transportation systems; and (16) water and wastewater systems.

By law, the US Secretary of Commerce (the Secretary) has up to 270 days from initiation, until June 18, 2022, to present Commerce’s findings and recommendations to the President. If the Secretary finds that NdFeB permanent magnets are being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security, the Secretary shall advise the President in her report on the findings of the investigation and recommendations regarding remedy.

Once the Secretary has delivered such a report to the President, the President then has 90 days to decide whether he concurs with the Secretary’s finding. If so, the President determines the nature and duration of the action that must be taken to adjust “the imports of the article and its derivatives” so that such imports will not threaten to impair the national security. Typically, remedies involve tariffs or quantitative restrictions.

Eric S. Parnes is an accomplished litigator, who focuses on advocating for and advising clients in international trade disputes and other high-stakes government-facing matters, including internal and government investigations and False Claims Act litigation.

Eric represents clients in complex disputes – in court, before administrative agencies, and before arbitral tribunals – and by conducting internal investigations and advising clients on corporate compliance matters.

Eric has represented clients in countervailing...

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 3 Grant Square #141 Hinsdale, IL 60521  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 or toll free (877) 357-3317.  If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.